检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:欧阳爱辉[1]
出 处:《青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第2期71-73,86,共4页Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:中国法学会部级法学研究青年项目(CLS<2014>Y03);湖南省教育厅优秀青年项目(2014XGY07);南华大学国社科预研项目(2014XGY07)
摘 要:作为一项新兴技术,大数据挖掘技术已在当代侦查活动中得到广泛应用。由于大数据挖掘技术的独立运用范围愈发广泛,难免造成普通民众的正当权益遭受侵害。大数据挖掘技术符合学界和司法实务界对技术侦查措施的主流界定,因此理当属于技术侦查措施而非辅助统计分析手段。同时因大数据挖掘技术符合学界对强制侦查措施划分的法理要求,即便信息是相关人员自愿提供,也不能否定其强制侦查措施的性质,因此还理当归于强制侦查措施而非任意侦查措施。As a new technology, big data mining technology has been widely applied in investigation nowadays. With the big data mining technology is applied independently more and more widely, it’s hard to avoid injuring the justice rights of common people. As big data mining technology meets the mainstream definition to technical investigation measure from academia and justice practice, we judge it as technical investigation measure, not assisting statistics analyze method. And meanwhile, as it conforms to the legal principle of classification on compulsory investigation from academia, even if the information is provided by related personnel voluntarily, it also cannot deny the attributes of compulsory investigation measure, that is to say, the big data mining technology can be judged as compulsory investigation measure, not consent investigation measure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.1.201