我国行政指导制度实证研究  

An Empirical Study of Chinese Administrative Guidance System

作　　者：戴翠婷 周欣桐[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《苏州教育学院学报》2015年第2期80-83,106,共5页Journal of Suzhou College of Education

基　　金：大学生创业创新计划省级重点项目(201310285027Z)

摘　　要：行政指导在我国行政管理体系中已经得到广泛适用,并提升了行政机关的社会形象。因为缺乏系统的理论研究和立法规范,在实践中产生了一定的负面影响,如行政指导缺乏公开性、一部分行政指导仍然具有强制性、责任追究机制不明、监督和救济制度缺失和行政指导滥用等。因此,可以通过建立和完善实体法律规范、程序法律规范和法律救济制度等途径,不断推进我国行政指导制度的发展。Administrative guidance has been widely used in the administrative management system in China and has improved the social image of the administrative departments. It produces some negative effects in practice for the lack of theoretical research and legislation. For instance, administrative guidance lacks of openness. Part of the administrative guidance still has mandatory. Mechanism of responsibility is undeifned and supervision and relief systems are absent. It also leads to the abuse of administrative guidance. Therefore, we should set up and improve the entity law, the procedure law and the legal relief system to push forward the development of China’s administrative guidance system.

关 键 词：行政指导 实证研究 实践问题 法律完善 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D630[政治法律—法学]