检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2015年第7期1071-1074,共4页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:甘肃省教育科学'十二五'规划2014年度一般课题(编号:GS[2014]GHB);西北民族大学科研创新团队项目(编号:20130713)
摘 要:目的:探讨藏族初中生父母教养方式与学习投入的关系。方法:采用父母教养方式量表(EMBU)、学习投入量表(LES)对藏族初中生982人进行整群施测。结果:1藏族初中生父母教养方式得分分别为(2.132±2.110)和(3.309±3.261);男生父母教养方式得分显著高于女生(t=4.169,P<0.01),而女生学习投入得分显著高于男生(t=4.024,P<0.01);教养方式与学习投入总分均存在显著年级差异(F=47.820,40.563;P<0.01);2藏族初中生父母教养方式与学习投入之间存在显著负相关(P<0.01),第一典型相关系数为0.439(P<0.01),与父母教养方式关系最为密切的是学习态度因子;3藏族初中生母亲情感温暖和理解、母亲拒绝和否认、母亲偏爱因子共同解释学习投入变量自我和谐的16.4%的变异。结论:藏族初中生父母教养方式与学习投入存在一定的关系,且具有自身的特点。Objective:To explore the relationship between parenting style and learning engagement of Tibet junior middle school students.Methods:982 Tibet junior middle school students were investigated by Scale of EMBU and LES( Learning Engagement Scale) .Results:①The scores of Tibet students&#39;paren-ting style and learning engagement were(2.132 ±2.110)and(3.309 ±3.261).Male students had higher scores of parenting style(t=4.169,P〈0.01)while lower scores of learning engagement( t=4.024,P〈0.01) than those of female students;There were significant differences in scores of parenting style and learning engagement among student grades;②There was negative relationship between parenting style and learning engagement in Tibet middle school students,and the most close relation was between parenting style and learning attitudes;③The variables such as maternal emotion and understanding, rejection and denial,maternal favoritism would explain 16.4%variance of students&#39;learning engagement together.Con-clusion:There are some relationships between parenting style and learning engagement of Tibet junior middle school students,and the relation is particular to some extent.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49