检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘长秋[1]
出 处:《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第4期1-8,共8页Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences)
基 金:中国法学会部级项目“代孕规制的法律问题研究”[CLS(2013)D109]阶段性成果;国家社科基金项目“人类辅助生殖法律制度比较研究”(12BFX113)阶段性成果
摘 要:权利只有在得到法律认同和许可的情况下才能够发挥其现实意义,就此而言,人们在一般意义上所探讨的权利其实是指法律权利。从权利的视角来看,禁止代孕并不构成对委托代孕者生育权以及代母身体权的侵害,相反,它恰恰是法律为以上两种权利设置的合理边界。支持代孕的权利说具有难以克服的理论缺陷,不足以成为代孕合法化的理由。我国现行立法对代孕采取了完全禁止的规制模式,但在禁止的力度上却比较微弱,这成为代孕在我国禁而不止的最主要原因。为更好地规制代孕,应当提升我国代孕规制的立法效力层次,并在刑法中增设代孕犯罪。Only when it's admitted by law,the right can play its role.From this standpoint,the right discussed by people refers to the legal right.From the perspective of right,the prohibiting of surrogacy doesn't cause harm to the reproductive rights of the principle as well as the right of body of the surrogate mother.On the contrary,it establishes the border of the above rights.The opinion supporting surrogacy rights has invincible defects in theory,which makes it difficult to be reasons for the legitimization of surrogacy.Although China prohibits surrogacy of any kind in law,yet the force of the prohibition is not severe as it should be,which is the ruling reason that results in the presence of surrogacy in China.In order to well regulate surrogacy,China should upgrade the legislation on surrogacy and set up crimes on surrogacy in addition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7