焦炉煤气HPF法脱硫工艺比较  

Comparison of HPF Desulfurization Process for Coke Oven Gas

作　　者：王燕霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]宝钢工程技术集团有限公司,上海201900

出　　处：《广东化工》2015年第12期99-101,93,共4页Guangdong Chemical Industry

摘　　要：简要介绍了国内焦化厂应用最多的HPF法脱硫工艺。针对HPF法脱硫工艺中高塔再生工艺、槽式喷射氧化再生工艺及一塔式脱硫三种工艺,从脱硫效果、占地、投资、运行费用、能耗及检修工作量等方面进行了对比分析,指出:在占地、运行费用极具受限的企业可选一塔式脱硫工艺;高塔再生工艺脱硫效果最稳定,首次投资稍高但其能耗、运行费及检修工作量均低于槽式喷射再生工艺,是目前HPF法脱硫工艺中最好的选择。This paper briefly introduces the most widely used HPF desulfurization process in the domestic coking plant, the HPF desulfurization process has three processes, the high-tower regeneration process, the trough-type jet-oxidation regeneration process and the One-tower type process. A comparison is done for the desulfurization effect, land occupation, the investment, operation, energy consumption and the maintenance workload of the 3 kinds of the processes..Pointing out： choosing One-Tower desulfurization process is better when the land is limited. High-tower regeneration desulfurization effect is the best, only has a higher one-time investment ,but its energy consumption, operating costs and the maintenance workload are lower than the trough-type jet-regeneration process of HPF desulfurization process, so it is the optional choice.

关 键 词：HPF法脱硫 高塔再生 喷射氧化再生 一塔式 

分 类 号：TQ[化学工程]