检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹松梅[1] 赵阳[1] 严金川[1] 梁仪[1] 徐芳[1]
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志》2015年第18期1350-1353,共4页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
基 金:江苏省医学创新团队与领军人才培养基金(L,1201116);中国医师协会阳光心血管研究基金(scRFcMDA201303);镇江市社会发展基金(SH2013023)
摘 要:目的 探讨院前护理干预在急性心肌梗死区域化协同救治中对改善患者救治延迟及预后的作用.方法 入选2012年1月至2014年5月在我院实施区域化协同救治的急性心肌梗死患者158例,根据是否实施院前护理干预分为干预组82例(实施区域化协同救治的院前护理干预)和对照组76例(采用传统护理).比较2组患者首次医疗接触至球囊扩张(FMC-to-B)时间、获得经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)手术知情同意时间、患者心功能等指标的差异.结果 干预组FMC-to-B及获得PCI手术知情同意时间均较对照组缩短[(94±21) min比(102±23) min,(5±3) min比(9±4) min,t=2.14、6.67,均P<0.05],术后1个月干预组患者左心室射血分数较对照组明显增高[(54.8±6.9)%比(50.1±8.2)%],左心室舒张末期内径较对照组明显下降[(48.8±6.9)mm比(50.5±5.6) mm].结论 院前护理干预能缩短区域化协同救治急性心肌梗死患者FMC-to-B时间,改善患者预后.Objective To explore the effect of pre-hospital nursing intervention in the new regional cooperative rescue model on treatment delay and the therapeutic effect in patients with myocardial infarction.Methods From January 2012 to May 2014,158 patients with acute myocardial infraction (AMI) were selected.Patients were divided into two groups,intervention group and control group,The first medical contact to balloon(FMC-to-B) time,referral time,cardiac function were analysed.Results Mean FMC-to-B time [(94±21)min vs.(102±23) min],referral time in nursing intervention [(5±3) min vs.(9±4) min)] were significantly shorter than those in control group (t=2.14,6.67,P〈0.05).After a month compared with control group,LVEF was increased [(54.8±6.9)% vs.(48.8±6.9)%],and LVED was deceased [(50.1±8.2) mm vs.(50.5±5.6)mm] in intervention group.Conclusions Pre-hospital nursing intervention can decrease the FMC-to-B time,which could improve the cardiac function.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222