检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《石油科技论坛》2015年第2期67-70,共4页PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FORUM
摘 要:科技管理是油公司竞争和发展的重要组成部分。目前油公司的科技管理体系大体有分层次独立管理型、总部集中管理型和混合型3种主要类型,其中前两种分别对应于立体网络的科技管理体系和线条式的管理体系。埃克森美孚和雪佛龙分别是这两种管理体系的典型代表。研究表明,这两种科技管理体系各有其利弊,只要根据公司实际情况选择合适的科技管理体系就能确保公司的技术发展,为业务发展提供更稳定的支撑。我国石油公司在对标国外公司科技管理体系时应注意从实际出发,结合国情,创新自己的道路。Technological management is an important integral part of an oil company's competitiveness and business development. Currently, the technological management systems of oil companies can be divided into three main types - independent management at various levels, concentrated management at headquarters and mixture. The former two types reflect technological management system of independent network and linear management system. ExxonMobil and Chevron typically represent the management systems of these two kinds respectively. The study indicates that these two technological management systems have their own advantages and disadvantages. The companies can select the appropriate technological management system according to their own actual conditions so as to ensure their technological development and provide stable support for business development. China's oil companies should create their own systems according to the Chinese conditions while learning from the technological management systems of foreign oil companies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28