检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙瑞[1]
机构地区:[1]陕西省榆林市第一医院骨科,陕西榆林718000
出 处:《实用临床医药杂志》2015年第12期67-69,共3页Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
基 金:中国高校医学期刊临床专项资金(11521134)
摘 要:目的探讨系统化整体护理在创伤性高位截瘫患者中的应用效果。方法选择创伤性高位截瘫患者130例,随机分为试验组65例和对照组65例,对照组给予创伤性高位截瘫常规护理,试验组给予系统化整体护理,比较2组患者干预前后焦虑和抑郁评分、并发症发生率及护理满意度。结果护理干预后2组焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分均低于干预前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),且试验组SAS、SDS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。试验组患者并发症发生率低于对照组,护理满意度高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对创伤性高位截瘫患者施以系统化整体护理干预,能帮助患者摆脱或缓解负性情绪的困扰,降低并发症发生率,提高护理满意度。Objective To explore the effect of systematic and holistic nursing on treatment of patients with traumatic high paraplegia. Methods A total of 130 patients with traumatic high paraplegia were randomly divided into experimental group ( n = 65) and control group ( n = 65). Regular nursing approach was given in the control group while systematic and holistic nursing was performed in the experimental group. Scores of anxiety and depression scale, incidence rate of com- plications and satisfactory degree toward nursing were compared before and after intervention between two groups. Results The self rating anxiety scale(SAS) and depression scale(SDS) decreased in both group after nursing intervention (P 〈 0.01 ). The experimental group achieved lower SAS and SDS scores when compared with the control group (P 〈 0.01 ), and the incidence rate of complications was significantly lower than the control group (P 〈 0.05). The satisfactory degree toward nursing in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Application of systematic and holistic nursing for patients with traumatic high paraplegia can relieve their negative emotions, reduce the incidence rate of complications and improve the satisfactory degree toward nursing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112