论以我国行为保全制度实现禁诉令功能  

Discussion on the Use of Act Preservation System to Achieve the Functions of Anti-Suit Injunction

作　　者：李晓枫[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学法学院,辽宁大连116026

出　　处：《法学杂志》2015年第7期132-140,共9页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(课题号:3132014313)

摘　　要：禁诉令制度反映了各国对司法管辖权的争夺。近年来,我国法院和当事人在涉外商事、海事诉讼中越来越多地受到外国法院禁诉令的冲击。我国法院在海事诉讼领域出现了积极的司法尝试,但也暴露了诸多问题。我国《民事诉讼法》中的行为保全制度为实现禁诉令功能提供了可能。我国应当以司法解释的形式明确以行为保全制度发挥禁诉令的功能,同时谨慎限定该类行为保全裁定的签发条件,适当限制管辖法院及审核流程,明确申请人可以向违反行为保全裁定的被申请人索赔。我国不宜适用行为保全制度处理区际管辖权冲突。Anti-suit injunction reflects the combat of jurisdiction. In recent years, our courts and parties suffer the impacts of other countries＇ anti-suit injunction. Our maritime courts have some positive judicial attempts, but also expose many deficiencies. Act preservation system in civil procedure law provides the possibility to achieve the functions of anti-suit injunction. The author advises that the Supreme Court＇ s judicial interpretation should provide the feasibility of act preservation to achieve the functions of anti-suit injunction, prudently define the conditions of issue, properly restrict the competent court and the examining procedure, explicitly grant the rights of claim to the applicant. The preservation system shall not apply to our inter-regional conflict of laws issues.

关 键 词：禁诉令制度 行为保全制度 司法博弈 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]