检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王哲[1,2]
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学研究生教育学院 [2]美国天普大学法学院
出 处:《国际商务研究》2015年第4期81-87,96,共8页International Business Research
基 金:上海地方高校大文科学术新人培育计划
摘 要:重新仲裁作为司法监督的形式之一,其适用情形应仅限于程序事项。《国际商事仲裁示范法》、英国和美国的立法也将重新仲裁的适用情形主要限定于程序事项。中国仲裁法将国内仲裁案件重新仲裁的适用情形限定于两项关于证据的实体事项,这与仲裁裁决的终局性不符。中国仲裁法应将国内和涉外仲裁案件重新仲裁的适用情形均限定于程序事项。Theoretically, the scope of judicial supervision on arbitration shall be limited to procedural matters and public order. Violation of the public order will lead to cancellation of the arbitral awards. Re-arbitration is one form of judicial supervision. Therefore, the applicable circumstances of re-arbitration shall be limited to procedural matters. Under UNCITRAL Model Law, English Arbitration Act and Arbitration Act of the United Sates, the applicable circumstances of re-arbitration are also mainly limited to procedural matters. Under Chinese law, for domestic arbitration cases, the applicable circumstances of re-arbitration are only limited to two matters related to evidence, which doesn' t conform to the finality of arbitration award. The ideal solution shall make the applicable circumstances of re-arbitration be limited to procedural matters for both domestic cases and foreign cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3