检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张亚楠[1] 张宗利[1] 李非凡[1] 杨慧[1] 袁新华[1,2]
机构地区:[1]南京农业大学无锡渔业学院,江苏无锡214081 [2]中国水产科学研究院淡水渔业研究中心,江苏无锡214081
出 处:《中国渔业经济》2015年第3期101-107,共7页Chinese Fisheries Economics
摘 要:为比较我国罗非鱼主产区广东、海南、广西、福建、云南五个省份的罗非鱼产业发展优势,本文比较了罗非鱼主产区生产布局,利用综合比较优势指数法测算和分析了主产区罗非鱼的规模优势指数、效率优势指数及综合优势指数。结果表明:海南省和云南省具有比较优势,广东、广西和福建具有比较劣势。提出了提高海南省罗非鱼比较优势及广东、广西、福建罗非鱼产业发展潜力,促进我国罗非鱼产业合理布局,提高区域间资源配置和利用效率,推动我国罗非鱼产业可持续发展的政策建议。Using comprehensive comparative advantage index, the tilapia industry development advantage in Guangdong, Hainan, Guangxi, Fujian, and Yunnan has been analyzed. The scale advantage index(SAI), efficiency advantage index(EAI) and comprehensive advantage index(AAI) was computed and compared. The results show that Hainan and Yunnan have the comparative advantages, and Guangdong, Guangxi, Fujian have comparative disadvantages. In view of the above results, the countermeasures on improving comparative advantage of Hainan, Guangdong, Guangxi, Fujian was suggested. To promote the reasonable resource allocation for tilapia industry in China, and improve the production efficiency should be considered in the promotion of sustainable tilapia industry development in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145