检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《河北法学》2015年第8期94-100,共7页Hebei Law Science
基 金:2014河北省社会科学基金项目<盗窃罪行为方式新解读>(HB14FX032)的成果之一
摘 要:传统通说认为盗窃罪窃取方式是秘密窃取,但是随着公开窃取方式的出现,主张将盗窃罪窃取方式扩大至公然窃取的观点不断占据重要地位,公然窃取方式的引入更有利于盗窃罪定罪标准的明确化,也更利于通说理论的继续发展。当然,为了更好地适用窃取方式,我们在将窃取方式扩充为公然的同时,也要对盗窃罪窃取方式的"平和性"和"公然性"进行合理的定性,并且针对不同的盗窃类型对"公然"进行形式划分。According the traditional view the theft stealing mode is the secret to steal, but with open stealing mode appears, advocated that the theft stealing mode expanded to steal openly views continue to occupy an important position, blatantly stealing explicit ways of introducing more conducive to the standard of conviction of the crime of theft, but also more conducive to the common theory of continued development. Of course, in order to openly at the same better apply the stealing mode, we will steal the expansion in time, also to the theft stealing mode " peace" and "flagrant" reasonable qualitative, and according to the different types of " flagrant" theft of forms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15