阻断司法救济的村民自治——以村委会选举权为视角  

Blocking Judicial Relief Within Rural Villagers' Autonomy in China:——From Perspective of Villagers' Committee Election

作　　者：蒋成旭 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院,杭州310008

出　　处：《西北农林科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第4期141-149,共9页Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目(11AZD020)

摘　　要：不同的法院对村民委员会选举名单纠纷案件存在受理与不予受理两种做法,但根据我国现行的制定法,法院不存在受理此类案件的依据。村民自治阻断司法救济有其历史原因和意义。立法机关未将村民委员会选举权纳入司法救济可能出于保护村民自治权的考虑,但村民自治权是法律赋予的,有其自治边界。由于当前农村社会已经发生巨大变革,加上基层政府的不当干预,村委会的角色功能发生错位。司法介入村民自治是解决现实问题的需要,司法介入村民自治并不会侵蚀村民的自治权。通过对政治权利内涵的拓展和村民自治边界的明晰化,司法介入存在理论上和实践上的可能性。There are two different practices of courts on cases verifying the qualifications for Villagers＇ Committee Elections：accepting the suits or rejecting the complaints.However,the fact is that acceptance for this kind of cases has no legal basis.The judicial review is restricted within Rural Villagers＇ Autonomy of China for a long history and with legislative purposes.While the right to vote for Villagers＇ Committee Elections is not available for judicial review,which is to protect the villagers＇ autonomy system,it＇s still within the boundary of rule of law.As the rural society in China has transferred in every aspect,with the local governments＇ improper intervention,the villagers committees＇ role and function have been dislocated.Releasing the judicial review within Rural Villagers＇ Autonomy,especially within the cases verifying the qualifications for Villagers＇ Committee Elections,is one possible and important solution,which will not erode the villagers＇ autonomy as long as operating within the boundary of rule of law.

关 键 词：司法救济 村民委员会 选民资格 自治 选举权 

分 类 号：F325.1[经济管理—产业经济]