检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆市渝北区人民医院感染病科,401120 [2]第三军医大学西南医院全军感染病研究所
出 处:《实用肝脏病杂志》2015年第4期356-359,共4页Journal of Practical Hepatology
摘 要:目的观察复方鳖甲软肝片联合恩替卡韦分散片(ETV)治疗慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)的临床疗效。方法将138例慢性乙型肝炎患者随机分为复方鳖甲软肝片和恩替卡韦分散片联合治疗73例和恩替卡韦分散片单药治疗65例,观察两组患者肝功能、乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)血清学标志物、HBV DNA定量、肝纤维化指标、腹部彩超检查的变化及药物不良反应。结果治疗48w后,两组患者肝功能与治疗前基线水平相比均显著改善[联合组治疗前后ALT为(118.7±70.9)U/L对(32.6±21.5)U/L,P<0.01;ALB为(38.5±3.8)g/L对(43.2±4.5)g/L,P<0.01];两组患者血清HBV DNA定量下降到检测水平以下的发生率分别为85.33%(64/73)和86.15%(56/65),HBe Ag血清学转换率分别为27.78%和15.15%(P>0.05);在治疗48w时,联合治疗组血透明质酸(HA)和脾脏长径分别为(172.40±58.16)μg/L和(10.15±0.12)cm,均较基线水平显著降低[(365.17±119.07)μg/L和(12.08±0.16)cm,P<0.05],且联合治疗组疗效优于单药组[HA为(218.13±75.32)μg/L,脾脏长径(11.90±0.20)cm,P<0.05]。结论ETV联合复方鳖甲软肝片治疗CHB患者疗效优于单用ETV,值得进一步验证。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of Fufang Biejia Ruangan tablet (FBR) combined with entecavir (ETV) in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods A total of 138 patients with CHB were enrolled and divided into two groups (73 in FBR plus ETV group,and 65 patients in ETV monotherapy group). Liver functions, HBV serological indicators, HBV DNA quantification,liver fibrosis markers, resuits of abdominal ultrasound and adverse drug reactions were recorded. Results The liver functions in both groups had been improved after 48-weeks treatment compared with those before treatment. ALT levels before and after treatment in patients of combination group were [(118.7±70.9) U/L vs. (32.6±21.5) U/L,P〈0.01] and ALB before and after treatment in combination group were [(38.5±3.8) g/L vs. (43.2±4.5) g/L,P〈0.01];No significant difference was seen between the two groups in serum clearance rate of HBV DNA and negative conversion rate of HBeAg [85.33% (64/73) vs. 86.15% (56/65),and 27.78% vs. 15.15%,respectively,P〉0.05 for both]; Serum hyaluronic acid (HA) and length of spleen in combination group reduced remarkably after 48-weeks treatment compared with those before treatment [-(172.40±58.16) μg/L vs. (365.17±119.07) μg/L for HA, P〈0.01 and (10.15±0.12) cm vs. (12.08±0.16) cm for the length of spleen,P〈0.051. Conclusion ETV combined with FBR provides better efficacy than ETV alone in the treatment of patients with CHB.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.226.159.125