检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈伟[1]
出 处:《北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第3期89-93,共5页Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJC630011)
摘 要:为了更好地发挥住房保障对收入分配的调节作用,需要从规范性角度探讨两者的内在联系。马克思的第一需要理论、福利经济学、政府干预理论和"第三条道路"的主张,为住房保障具有调节收入分配的作用提供了理论依据。住房保障对收入分配的调节,能够通过影响国民收入初次分配、二次分配和居民的财产性收入得以实现。不同的住房保障政策调节收入分配的效果不尽相同,我国需要在保障形式、配租方式、保障标准和规划建设等方面完善住房保障制度。Intrinsic relationship between housing security and income distribution from the perspective of specification should be explored in order to develop the moderating role of housing security on income distribution. Marx's first need theory,welfare economics,theory of governmental intervention and the proposition of the " third way" are all theoretical foundation for this role of housing security. It is found that this moderating role can be reflected by influencing the primary and secondary distribution of national income,as well as residents' property income. Empirical study reveals that the moderating effects vary with the choices of housing security policies. As a result,it is necessary to make improvements on security forms,subsidy modes,security standards,planning and construction,etc.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145