检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《现代医院》2015年第7期85-87,共3页Modern Hospitals
基 金:广东省医学科研基金项目(编号:A2014577)
摘 要:目的探讨自我护理模式(Orem)干预对老年肺结核患者生活质量及心理状态的影响。方法选取68例老年肺结核患者随机分为对照组(n=31)和观察组(n=37)。对照组仅给常规护理,观察组给予Orem干预。比较两组患者健康调查量表(SF-36)评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分及满意度。结果干预后,观察组SF-36八个维度评分显著升高,与对照组比较差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05);观察组SDS及SAS评分显著降低,与对照组比较差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。对照组和观察组患者对护理工作满意度分别为77.4%(24/31)、94.6%(35/37),两组比较差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论采用Orem干预可有效改善老年肺结核患者生活质量及心理状态,值得临床推广使用。Objective To evaluate the effect of Orem intervention on the living quality and psychological state of elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Methods Sixty - eight elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosis were randomly divided into control group ( n = 31 ) and observation group ( n = 37 ). Orem intervention was applied in the observation group, while routine nursing was used in the control group. The score of short -form -36 health survey (SF -36 ) , self- rating depression scale (SDS), self -rating anxiety scale (SAS) and satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results After the intervention, the SF -36 scores of observation group were significantly increased in 8 dimensions, compared with control group, with statistically significant differences (p 〈0.05). Compared with the control group, the SDS and SAS scores of the observation group were significantly decreased statistically (p 〈 0.05 ). The satisfaction rates of the control group and the observation group were respectively 77.4% (24/ 31 ) and 94.6% (35/37), with statistically significant differences (p 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Orem intervention can effectively improve the living quality and psychological state of elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, worth clinical promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.100.204