“出租汽车”类歧义动名组合格式理解策略  

Comprehension Strategies for Verb-noun Combination of Ambiguous Pattern Similar to " Taxi"

作　　者：王淑华[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海大学,上海200444

出　　处：《广播电视大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第2期61-67,共7页Journal of Radio & TV University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(09YJC740050);上海市哲学社会科学规划青年项目(2009EYY001);上海市教委科研创新一般项目(10YZ21)资助

摘　　要：抽象的歧义格式实例化以后,仍有部分留有歧义。就静态的歧义实例而言,其歧义也是一种潜在歧义,不同句法关系在动态使用中的实现频率不同。"出租汽车"类歧义格式"V+N"在实际语料中实现为定中关系的频率远远高于实现为述宾关系的频率,这与动词修饰名词时多为"贴身"定语、光杆名词的语义自足度远远低于名词短语、概念表达和信息传达方式等都有关系。名词充任宾语或中心语时,语义类别差异较大,且伴有较为明显的形式标记。基于此,针对语流中的合法语串"V+N",提出了句法优选、语义验证、语境确认三步走的理解策略。After instantiated abstract ambiguous patterns, some of them still exist static and potential ambiguity, which dispels in a dynamic use with different realization frequency in different syntactic relations. In the actual corpus, the ＂V ＋ N＂ ambiguous pattern similar to ＂Taxi＂ instances contain far more frequency in attaining modifier- head constructions than in doing narrative -object ones,which is related with that the verb modifying a noun mostly achieves ＂personal＂ attribute , semantic self - sufficiency of a single noun is much lower than the noun phrase, and the methods of concep- tion expression and information communication, besides, a noun phrase acting as object or center has great different in semantic category and accompanied by more obvious mark forms. Based on all above mentioned characteristics, aiming to the legitimate ＂V ＋ N＂ in language norm, this paper advances the three - successive - step comprehension strategies for ambiguity patterns ： syntactic optimization, semantic verification and context confirmation i. e.

关 键 词：歧义格式 V双+N双 理解策略 句法优选 语义验证 语境确认 

分 类 号：H146[语言文字—汉语]