广东省肿瘤3项医疗技术培训基地建设现状探讨  

Construction of training bases for three tumor therapies in Guangdong province

作　　者：李虹[1,2] 邓国娜 郭洁吾 邱森玲 范卫君[6] 张福君[6] 崔书中[7] 

机构地区：[1]广东省医学学术交流中心 [2]广东省医学会综合评审部,广州市510180 [3]南方医科大学,广州市510515 [4]广东省医学学术交流中心综合评审部 [5]广东省卫生和计划生育委员会,广州市510060 [6]中山大学肿瘤防治中心,广州市510060 [7]广州医科大学附属肿瘤医院,510095

出　　处：《实用医学杂志》2015年第12期2031-2034,共4页The Journal of Practical Medicine

基　　金：广东省医学科学技术研究基金资助项目(编号:A2013109)

摘　　要：目的:分析问卷调查并探讨肿瘤3项医疗技术规范化培训基地(简称基地)建设及培训现状。方法:选取肿瘤3项技术能力审核≥90分的三甲医院6家设8个基地作为研究对象。结果:8个基地建设中硬件条件全部符合认定、6个符合培训师资职称与人数要求、年完成技术例数热疗与粒子技术符合率为100%、消融技术符合率为80%。学员在培训期间参与完成技术操作消融与粒子技术基本达标、热疗技术未达标,培训前后理论考试和操作考核成绩具有显著差异(P<0.01)。结论:应完善各项管理制度,重视软件和师资队伍建设,严把培训师资质量关;强化临床技能训练和规范考核流程,针对原专业调整培训内容比例。Objective To study the construction of training bases for three tumor therapies. Methods Eight training bases in six third-level first-class hospitals with score of technology assessment higher than 90 were investigated. Results There were good hardware in all training bases and qualified teaching staff in six of them. Annual operative quantity of hyperthermia and radioactive particles implantation technology of all training bases were up to the standard , while the coincidence rate of ablation technology was 80%. Besides , quantity of ablation technology and radioactive particles implantation technology trainees participated in during training met the standard, but that of hyperthermia not. There were significant difference in theory and operational test results before and after training （P 〈 0.01）. Conclusions Management system, operative quantity and teaching staff construction need to be improved. Clinical skills training and standardized training assessment should be strengthened in base construction.

关 键 词：肿瘤治疗 医疗技术 培训基地 建设现状 

分 类 号：R197.6[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]