德国联邦议会立法辩论制度述评  

Review of the Institution of Legislative Debate in German Federal Parliament

作　　者：李店标[1] 

机构地区：[1]大庆师范学院法学院,黑龙江大庆163712

出　　处：《河北科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第2期58-62,共5页Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences

基　　金：黑龙江省社会科学规划项目"立法辩论制度及其中国化研究"(13E002)

摘　　要：德国联邦议会立法辩论制度的形成经历了依靠惯例辩论、临时制定规则、初具形态、定型和完善四个时期。当下德国联邦议会立法辩论分为一般性辩论和逐条辩论两种类型,二者在辩论目的和具体操作上有所区别。德国联邦议会立法辩论制度具有参议院功能有限、元老院协调意见分歧和议会党团辩论前置的特点,辩论分工的明确性、辩论内容的细致性和辩论程序的公开性是其优点,程序设置较为繁琐、沦为党派斗争的工具和为行政机关所主导是其缺点。对德国联邦议会立法辩论制度进行考察和评析有助于为我国此项制度的建构提供借鉴。The formation of institution of legislative debate in German Federal Parliament experiencedfour periods ,such as debate relying on convention, provisionally designated the rules, taking shape,formation and perfection. Legislative debate in German Federal Parliament can be divided into twotypes of general debate and one-on-one debate, which are different in debate purpose and operation.The institution of legislative debate in German Federal Parliament shows its own characteristics, suchas the function of Bundesrat limited, Senate coordinate disagreement and parliamentary group pre-debate. Its advantages are division of debate clarity, content of debate detailed and process of debatepublicity. It also has many disadvantages, including process setting complicated and a partisan tool anddominated by the administration. Inspection and comment on the institution of legislative debate in GermanFederal Parliament can help to learn from experience on establishing the institution in China.

关 键 词：德国 联邦议会 立法 立法辩论 

分 类 号：D920.0[政治法律—法学]