检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:关庆华[1]
机构地区:[1]西华师范大学政治学研究所,四川南充637000
出 处:《大庆师范学院学报》2015年第4期118-122,共5页Journal of Daqing Normal University
摘 要:唐代谏官制度作为行政监督的重要组成部分,其组织架构有散骑常侍、谏议大夫、拾遗、补阙、给事中、起居郎,具有谏诤范围广泛、权力行使相对独立、谏官位卑权重、制度运行命系君主的特点。其在谏诤之风、谏诤之制、谏诤之人、谏诤之基方面取得成功,起到了制约君主权力、完善监督机制、引入社会监督的作用,对完善现代行政监督的启示是应加强行政监督法治化、制度化建设,组建高水平行政监督队伍,创设良好的行政监督环境。Advisory system in Tang Dynasty was an important part of its administrative supervision,and its organization was structured by cavalier attendant- in- ordinary,chief advisory official,pickup official,makeup official,supervising secretary,and daily recorder. The system features a wide range of advisory,a relatively independent exercise of power,low- ranked officials with high power,and monarch- decided running. The system was successful in its influence,system,officials and basis,and was functional in restraining the power of the monarch,perfecting the supervision mechanism and introducing social supervision. By analyzing this system,the author proposes some ways to perfect modern administrative supervision,which is strengthening the rule of law and institutionalization of the administrative supervision,organizing highly qualified administrative supervisors,and creating a favorable environment for administrative supervision.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117

