Comparison on Detection Results of PRV Wild Virus Antibody Provided by Different Institutions  

作　　者：Sun Hua Song Zhongxu Zeng Defang Li Lianghua Li Mingbo Dong Binke Mei Shuqi Peng Xianwen Wu Huayu 

机构地区：[1]Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science,Hubei Academy of Agricultural Science [2]Institute of Agriculture Quality Standard and Detection Technology,Hubei Academy of Agricultural Science

出　　处：《Animal Husbandry and Feed Science》2015年第2期101-102,共2页动物与饲料科学（英文版）

基　　金：Supported by National Swine Industry Technology System(CARS-36);National Key Technology R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology(2011BAD28B01);Technology Innovation Center of Hubei Province(2011-620-001-003)

摘　　要：The detection results from different institutions were performed at the first stage of PRV wild virus antibody supervision in swine breeding. The serum samples were collected from 71 individuals and each individual was sampled twice at one week interval. The results showed that the positive coincidences for gE antibody between two institutions were 35.71% and 45.45 % ：espectively, with the total detection coincidences of 87.32% and 91.55% correspondingly. The positive coincidences for gE antibody between the two detections of each institution were 40.00% and 75.00% respectively, with the total detection coincidences of 87.32% and 97.18% correspondingly. It indicates that it is very necessary to screen the detection institution at the first supervision stage of PRV wild vires for swine population.The detection results from different institutions were performed at the first stage of PRV wild virus antibody supervision in swine breeding. The serum samples were collected from 71 individuals and each individual was sampled twice at one week interval. The results showed that the positive coincidences for gE antibody between two institutions were 35.71% and 45.45 % ：espectively, with the total detection coincidences of 87.32% and 91.55% correspondingly. The positive coincidences for gE antibody between the two detections of each institution were 40.00% and 75.00% respectively, with the total detection coincidences of 87.32% and 97.18% correspondingly. It indicates that it is very necessary to screen the detection institution at the first supervision stage of PRV wild vires for swine population.

关 键 词：Pseudorabies virus （PRV） PRV wild virus antibody Comparative test 

分 类 号：S855.3[农业科学—临床兽医学]