检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]闽江学院新华都商学院,福州350121 [2]闽江学院外语系,福州350121
出 处:《日本问题研究》2015年第3期12-19,共8页Japanese Research
摘 要:从技术创新投入、技术创新产出、技术创新基础、技术创新效率方面对中日韩三国在2000年至2011年的技术创新能力进行了定量分析比较。研究发现日本的技术创新能力呈现出下降趋势,韩国的技术创新基础提高显著并且技术创新效率较高。我国的技术创新能力大幅度提高,技术创新投入和产出较高,但是技术创新基础还需要进一步提高。为中国的技术创新的持续性发展提供了一些政策性建议。This paper attempts to quantitatively analyze and compare the technological innovation capability of China, Japan, and Korea by their inputs, outputs, infrastructure, and efficiency of technological innovation in the period of 2000 and 2011. The study found that Japan's technological innovation capability was declining; Korea's infrastructure of technological innovation was greatly improved and its efficiency of technological innovation was the highest among the three countries. China's technological innovation capability was im among the three recommendations countries but pro its ved dramatically and its inputs and outputs of technological innovation were the highest infrastructure needed to be further developed. The paper concludes with a few macro-level for policy makers on how to sustainably develop China's technological innovation capability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3