史家三巨擘 同门而异彩--傅斯年、范文澜、金毓黻的交往及学术人生论析  

Three Great Historians of Different Tastes from the Same Master: on Interrelationship between Fu Sinian,Fan Wenlan and Jin Yufu and Their Academic Lives

作　　者：周文玖[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学历史学院、史学理论与史学史研究中心,北京100875

出　　处：《史学史研究》2015年第2期46-62,共17页Journal of Historiography

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目“民国时期史学之研究”(项目号:10JJD770005);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(项目号:SKZZY2014032)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：傅斯年、范文澜、金毓黻都是出身于北京大学国文门的著名史学家,都曾师从黄侃,得到黄侃的赞赏。但他们从北大毕业后,与黄侃关系亲疏不一。金毓黻与黄侃关系最笃,范文澜次之,傅斯年最淡。傅斯年、范文澜都有明确的政治立场,代表了史学发展之两翼,且在各自的学术机关居于领导地位。金毓黻与他们二人均有交往,对其学术亦有自己的评论,治学能谨守绳尺,本师说以为学,依违于二人之间。但国学功底深厚,重视民族气节以及对民族文化抱有深厚的情感,是他们立身行事以及学术著述的共同特点,反映了早年共同的师承对其学术的深层影响。Fu Sinian, Fan Wenlan and Jin Yufu were famous historians who graduated from Department of Chinese Classics, Peking University, and all of them were apprenticed to Huang Kan and were all highly praised by him. Their relationships with Huang were different since they graduated from Peking University. Jin was the closest to Huang, Fan came second, and Fu the last. Both Fu and Fan were the leaders of the historical institutes that they served for, and were both representative scholars of two different historical schools. Jin kept friendship with the other two. He was utterly true to his own belief and obeyed Huang Kan＇ s academic discipline. The three historians share some common features in having sound foundation of Chinese Classics and cherishing national moral and culture, which indicates their master Huang Kan＇ s academic influence upon them.

关 键 词：黄侃 傅斯年 范文澜 金毓黻 史料派 史观派 民族文化 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]