民事证人出庭作证费用支付探究——对新民诉法第74条规定的再完善建议  

Explorement on Payment for Civil Witness Testifying——Suggestions for Improvement on the 74th Provision of Civil Procedure Law

作　　者：刘宇驰[1] 孙晨[1] 

机构地区：[1]云南大学,云南昆明650500

出　　处：《湖北函授大学学报》2015年第12期92-93,共2页

摘　　要：在民事诉讼程序中,了解案件一定程度上的客观真实情况并有相应能力出庭作证的证人出庭作证系其本人向人民法院应尽之义务,而人民法院亦不应当令证人因出庭支持司法机关工作而蒙受个人损失。尽管新修改的民事诉讼法在新添加的第74条中已经明文规定了证人出庭费用最终由败诉一方负担,并初示此类费用的支付路径,但本条规定仍然存在一定的漏洞与不适性。事实上,首先明确证人作证所涉及费用的范畴及相应量化标准,其次由人民法院在充分审查证人出庭作证的相关费用的合法性、合理性的情况下统一预先支付该笔费用,最终将此部分费用划入相关诉讼费用中并明确由哪方当事人承担较为合理,此路径更为适宜。In the proceedings,testifying on the court should be a kind of obligation for the witness. Of course,the court need to protect the one＇s benefit. Although the new Civil Procedure Law clearly defined that the litigation costs should be paid by the loser side,and clearly elaborated how to be defrayed. But there are also some loopholes and shortcomings. Actually,firstly,determine the cost range and clear the quantitative criteria. Then the court unified pre-paid the fee after series of reviews. At last,put this part of expense into related litigation costs and make sure that who are the payers. This approach is more appropriate.

关 键 词：证人出庭 作证费用 支付标准 支付路径 

分 类 号：D920.4[政治法律—法学]