检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王琳[1]
出 处:《哈尔滨学院学报》2015年第7期60-63,共4页Journal of Harbin University
摘 要:近日,"关门收费"成为舆论的焦点,从法理学视角来看,这一事件是当地政府、商户居民和游客权利冲突失调的结果。公共决策牵涉多方利益,是权利冲突的焦点。凤凰收费事件实质上是公共决策中价值、利益以及制度调节失败所引发的官民争利,由于收费决策违反了程序与结果的公正,并且未能实现公共决策利益协调的功能。因此,决策机关应当树立正确的价值观、恪行利益划分进行科学决策,以使公共决策为人信服和遵守,真正做到为人民服务。Lately,the practice of"close the door to charge"in Phoenix City has been a hot issue. From the perspective of jurisprudence,this results from the failure of dealing with the conflict of the local government,commercial tenants,and tourists. Public policy decision involves the interests of many parties. The nature of this issue is that the government and people fight for interest. Since the decision of charging is unfair and fails to coordinate the harmony of interests in public decision making. Therefore,the decision making institute should set up a just value perspective and stick to the principle of interest division in the process of decision making,by which public decision may be more convincing and fair.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28