论法律权利的冲突与协调——兼议凤凰古城之“关门收费”  

Conflict and Coordination of Legal Right——“Close the Door to Charge”of Phoenix City

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:王琳[1] 

机构地区:[1]安徽大学法学院,安徽合肥230601

出  处:《哈尔滨学院学报》2015年第7期60-63,共4页Journal of Harbin University

摘  要:近日,"关门收费"成为舆论的焦点,从法理学视角来看,这一事件是当地政府、商户居民和游客权利冲突失调的结果。公共决策牵涉多方利益,是权利冲突的焦点。凤凰收费事件实质上是公共决策中价值、利益以及制度调节失败所引发的官民争利,由于收费决策违反了程序与结果的公正,并且未能实现公共决策利益协调的功能。因此,决策机关应当树立正确的价值观、恪行利益划分进行科学决策,以使公共决策为人信服和遵守,真正做到为人民服务。Lately,the practice of"close the door to charge"in Phoenix City has been a hot issue. From the perspective of jurisprudence,this results from the failure of dealing with the conflict of the local government,commercial tenants,and tourists. Public policy decision involves the interests of many parties. The nature of this issue is that the government and people fight for interest. Since the decision of charging is unfair and fails to coordinate the harmony of interests in public decision making. Therefore,the decision making institute should set up a just value perspective and stick to the principle of interest division in the process of decision making,by which public decision may be more convincing and fair.

关 键 词:权利冲突 价值冲突 利益冲突 制度调节 

分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象