中国新型城镇化协调水平测度及空间差异分析  

Coordination Level Measurement and Analysis of Regional Differences of New Urbanization in China

作　　者：贾兴梅[1] 贾伟[2] 

机构地区：[1]安徽工业大学商学院,安徽马鞍山243002 [2]中国农业科学院农业经济与发展研究所,北京100081

出　　处：《统计与信息论坛》2015年第7期22-29,共8页Journal of Statistics and Information

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目<城镇化对中国经济增长和地区差异的影响>(71403274);安徽工业大学青年教师科研基金项目<中国制造业集聚与城市化的空间效应分析>(QS201408);中国农业科学院科技创新工程项目<城镇化对农产品区域流通的影响研究>(ASTIP-IAED-2015-04)

摘　　要：运用TOPSIS方法从人口、土地、经济、社会等四个角度测算中国整体和各省份城镇化协调水平,并对不同区域城镇化协调度进行比较。研究结果表明:1.中国整体城镇化协调水平相对较低;东部地区城镇化水平高于中部和西部地区;2.中国各省份城镇化协调性水平差异明显,总体来看,发达省份城镇化协调水平相对较高;3.不同驱动要素对城镇化协调水平的差异明显,具体排序为土地城镇化、经济城镇化、社会城镇化、人口城镇化,其中东部地区经济城镇化的表现尤为明显,中、西部地区土地城镇化的表现较为突出。根据以上研究结论,提出了相关的政策建议。This paper used TOPSIS method to calculate and compare urbanization coordination of different regions, from the angle of population, land, economic, social perspective. The results showed that： （1） The coordination of urbanization coordination level in china is low in China; coordination level of eastern, central and western regions was in descending order. （2） Urbanization coordination levels of Chinese provinces have significant differences. Overall, urbanization coordination levels of developed provinces are relatively high. （3） Different driving factors to measure the level of urbanization was significantly different, the sort order was land urbanization, economic urbanization, social urbanization, population urbanization; economic urbanization in eastern regions particularly evident, while land urban in the central and western region is more prominent. Based on the results of this paper, this paper put forward relevant policy recommendations.

关 键 词：城镇化 城镇化协调水平 区域差异 TOPSIS方法 

分 类 号：F291[经济管理—国民经济] C81[社会学—统计学]