利润率变化方向是“不确定”的吗？--基于经济思想史的批判与反批判  

Is the Direction of the Changing Rate of Profit "Uncertain" ?——Based on the Criticism and Counter-Criticism of the History of Economic Thoughts

作　　者：薛宇峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]云南财经大学,云南昆明650221

出　　处：《马克思主义研究》2015年第7期74-84,159,共11页Studies on Marxism

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“国外劳动价值论‘新解释'最新发展研究”(12BJL002);云南省哲学社会科学课题“劳动价值论‘新解释'的最新进展研究”(YB201113)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：对利润率趋向下降规律的各种批判与反批判持续至今,我们面临着如何准确认识和理解马克思的相对剩余价值理论和资本主义生产方式下的利润率下降规律的问题,同时也面临着如何正确发展与创新马克思经济学的问题。迈克尔·海因里希认为,利润率趋向下降规律是一个失败的理论,"规律本身"是不确定的,此规律是不能被经验证明的。本文论证了凯恩斯经济学和新古典经济学的责难与批判在理论上和现实中为何都无法成立?究其原因无疑在于其错误理解和故意歪曲了马克思的相关论述,马克思的理论和它们有着本质上的区别与差异。With the criticism and counter-criticism over the law of the falling rate of profit still continuing today,we are now facing with the problem of how to accurately understand Marx's theory of relative surplus value and the law of the falling rate of profit under the capitalist mode of production,as well as how to develop and innovate Marxist economics.Michael Heinrich believes that the law of the falling rate of profit is a failed theory,since 'the law itself' is uncertain and cannot be empirically proved.This paper demonstrates the way that the criticism of Keynesian economics and neoclassical economics cannot be upheld in reality.The reason undoubtedly lies in their misunderstanding and deliberate distortion of Marx's discussion in diis issue,given that Marx's theory is fundamentally different from theirs.

关 键 词：利润率下降规律 相对剩余价值 琼·罗宾逊 斯威齐 置盐信雄 

分 类 号：F091.3[经济管理—政治经济学]