检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢蕴秋[1] 贾杨阳[1] 李毓[1] 陶方萍[1]
机构地区:[1]蚌埠医学院第一附属医院,安徽蚌埠233004
出 处:《齐鲁护理杂志》2015年第13期17-19,共3页Journal of Qilu Nursing
基 金:安徽省高校省级自然科学研究项目(编号:KJ2009B224Z)
摘 要:目的:探讨呼吸机集束干预策略(VCB)在预防ICU呼吸机相关性肺炎中的应用效果。方法:将120例本院ICU患者按照进入科室顺序编号,奇数为实验组(n=60),按照呼吸机集束干预策略进行护理;偶数为对照组(n=60),实施常规护理;比较两组MV时间、住院时间、VAP发生率,并记录相关护理措施执行情况。结果:实验组在患者MV时间、住院时间、VAP发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。当患者胃液p H值>4及胃残留量>200 ml时,其发生VAP的可能性增加。结论:(VCB)比常规护理更利于预防呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生,值得在临床进一步应用。Objective:To investigate the effect of application of the bundle of intervention strategies in the prevention of ventilator asso-ciated pneumonia(VAP)in ICU patients. Methods:120 patients in ICU of the hospital were divided into the experimental group(n=60) and the control group(n=60)according to the sequence number. The patients in the experimental group were provided the bundle of inter-vention strategies and the patients in the control groups were given routine nursing care. The duration of mechanical ventilation,hospitaliza-tion time and the incidence of VAP were compared between the two groups. Results:The duration of MV,hospitalization time and the inci-dence of VAP were shorter and less in the experimental group than the control group(P〈0. 05). Conclusion:The bundle of intervention strategies is more conducive to the prevention of VAP than routine nursing care.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28