检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何枫[1] 祝丽云[1,2] 马栋栋[1] 姜维[1,3]
机构地区:[1]北京科技大学东凌经济管理学院,北京100083 [2]河北农业大学海洋学院,河北秦皇岛066003 [3]中国钢铁工业协会北京100711
出 处:《中国工业经济》2015年第7期84-98,共15页China Industrial Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目“减量化与低碳双重约束下中国高能耗制造企业技术效率评价与提升研究”(批准号71272160);河北省科技计划项目“能源与环境约束下河北省钢铁产业网络DEA效率评价及产业结构升级研究”(批准号15454013D);教育部科学技术委员会战略研究重大项目“碳交易视角下制造业全产业链综合价格指数战略研究”(批准号KJW-A-1410)
摘 要:目前能源环境约束下的中国钢铁工业绿色转型问题受到了学术界越来越多的关注。本文构建了考虑非期望产出的网络SBM-DEA模型,从铁前工序和铁后工序两阶段视角测算了2009—2013年中国钢铁企业绿色技术效率,重点探讨了环境规制强度对绿色技术效率的影响。测算结果显示,钢铁企业整体的以及铁前和铁后工序阶段的绿色技术效率均呈现倒U型曲线特征。从生产流程的角度看,铁前工序阶段在效率挖掘方面潜力相对更大;从区域分布的角度看,东、中、西部地区钢铁企业的绿色技术效率依次递减。进一步的实证分析结果表明,当前的环境规制强度与绿色技术效率之间的负相关关系并不显著,资源循环利用率与绿色技术效率之间的正相关关系也不显著,未能观测到环境保护、资源循环利用与企业产出增长"双赢"的效果。然而,研究结果也表明研发投资率可以显著促进绿色技术效率增长。因此,在加强环保监管力度的前提下,提高环境规制强度、增加环保投入及自主研发投入是中国钢铁企业绿色技术效率提升可咨考虑的重要途径。The green transformation of iron and steel industry under the restriction of energy and environment causes great concern in theoretical circles. This paper proposes the undesirable network SBM-DEA model and measures the overall and two-stage green technical efficiencies of 37 iron and steel enterprises in China during the period of 2009--2013 from the perspective of pre-iron stage and post-iron stage. And we mainly examine the impact of environmental regulation intensity on the overall green technical efficiency. The efficiency measurement results show that: both the overall and two-stage green technical efficiencies showing the inverted-U type curve feature. There is more efficiency improvement potential in the pre-iron stage from the perspective of production process. The overall green technical efficiency of iron and steel enterprises in eastern, central and western area is decreasing in turn from the perspective of regional distribution. Furthermore, the empirical analysis results indicate that the environmental regulation intensity have a non-significant negative influence on the overall green technical efficiency, and the positive correlation between resources recycling rate and the green technical efficiency is not significant. In other words, it cannot bring the win-win opportunities of simultaneous improvements in the output increase and environmental performance and the resources recycling utilization. However, the results also manifest that the R&D investment rate can promote the green technical efficiency growth significantly. Therefore, it is concluded that under the premise of strengthening environmental supervision, enforcing the environmental regulation intensity, increasing the investment of environment protection and independent R&D is the crucial way of accelerating overall green technical efficiency increase significantly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46