检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱文涛[1] 张丽丽[1] 张金鹏[1] 石元元[1] 乔延江[1]
机构地区:[1]北京中医药大学,北京100029
出 处:《中国中医药信息杂志》2015年第8期26-30,共5页Chinese Journal of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的构建上市中药企业竞争力评价指标体系,为评价我国上市中药企业竞争力提供有效的技术和手段。方法通过文献研究初步得到指标库,然后采用德尔菲法进行咨询,请20名相关领域资深专家依据各指标重要性打分,筛选上市中药企业竞争力评价指标体系维度及指标池,经过2轮问卷咨询,最终形成指标体系。结果第1、2轮问卷咨询的专家积极系数分别为95%、100%,专家权威程度为0.713 2,专家协调系数分别为0.659、0.639,指标体系最终包含5个1级指标、26个2级指标。结论本次德尔菲法专家积极系数及权威程度均较高,第2轮咨询专家的意见已趋于一致,形成的上市中药企业竞争力评价指标体系结果可信。Objective To construct the competitiveness evaluation index system of listed TCMpharmaceutical companies and provide efficient technology and methods for the evaluation inrelated field. Methods Index base was founded by the means of the literature research method atfirst. Then 20 experts were asked to score all these indexes according to the importance of eachindex. Dimensionality and index base of competitiveness evaluation index system of listed TCMpharmaceutical companies were screened. With two rounds of questionnaires, the evaluationindex system was constructed finally. Results The positive coefficients of two rounds of expertconsultation were 95% and 100%;the cooperative coefficients were 0.659 and 0.639;theauthoritative coefficient was 0.713 2. Evaluation system consisted of 5 first grade indexes and 26second grade indexes. Conclusion The positive coefficients and the authoritative coefficients areboth high enough through Delphi method. Opinions of all the experts in the two round of expertconsultation tend to be uniform, which reveals that the evaluation index system of listed TCMpharmaceutical companies is relatively scientific.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229