检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑婉文[1] 邱益娟[1] 林燕芬[1] 林丽霞[1]
机构地区:[1]中山市人民医院产科,528403
出 处:《中国实用医药》2015年第18期213-214,共2页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨产前护理干预对分娩方式的影响。方法回顾性分析1350例产妇的临床资料。将所有产妇随机分为对照组(623例)和干预组(727例),对照组接受常规检查和护理,干预组接受产前护理干预。比较两组产妇分娩方式、产后出血、新生儿窒息等发生情况。结果干预组剖宫产率为17.33%,明显低于对照组的54.74%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预组的产后出血率为2.06%,新生儿窒息率为2.20%,明显低于对照组的5.94%、6.26%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论产前护理干预有助于提高产科质量,保证母婴安全,降低剖宫产率,值得临床推广应用。Objective To investigate influence of prenatal nursing intervention on delivery ways. Methods Clinical data of 1350 puerpera were retrospectively analyzed. All puerpera were randomly divided into control group(623 cases) and intervention group(727 cases). The control group received conventional examination and nursing, and the intervention group received prenatal nursing intervention. Delivery ways, and status of postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal asphyxia were compared between the two groups. Results The intervention group had much lower cesarean section rate as 17.33% than 54.74% of the control group, and their difference had statistical significance(P〈0.05). The intervention group also had obviously lower postpartum hemorrhage rate as 2.06% and lower neonatal asphyxia rate as 2.20% than 5.94% and 6.26% of the control group. The difference had statistical significance(P〈0.05). Conclusion Prenatal nursing intervention is helpful for improving obstetric quality, ensuring maternal and child safety, and reducing cesarean section rate. It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.24