论公物利用侵权的司法救济——以主观公权利与司法救济的对应关系为线索  

On Judicial Relief of Infringing the Utilization of Public Properties——Taking the Corresponding Relationship between Subjective Public Right and Judicial Relief as the Clue

作　　者：梁君瑜 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《太原理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第3期17-22,共6页Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"公物利用法律问题研究"(09XFX009);国家2011计划"司法文明协同创新"

摘　　要：公物利用是一种复合型主观公权利。因主观公权利与司法救济存在对应关系,所以归纳公物利用侵权形态并分析其损及的主观公权利类型,是完善我国相应司法救济的逻辑起点。我国公物利用侵权的司法救济在救济方式之实效性、救济对象之覆盖性、救济利益之明确性、救济模式之全面性等方面存在不足,应通过推动撤销判决彻底化、理顺一般给付判决的覆盖面、延展课予义务判决的适用场域、引入居民诉讼制度等方式来达致相应司法救济的理想归结。The utilization of public properties is a compound subjective public right.Because of the corresponding relationship between subjective public right and judicial relief,summing up the forms of infringing the utilization of public properties and analyzing the styles of the damaged subjective public right are the logical starting point to perfect corresponding judicial relief in China.Judicial relief of infringing the utilization of public properties in China is faced with deficiencies in the effectiveness of relief ways,the coverage of relief objects,the definition of relief interests,the comprehensiveness of relief models etc.In order to improve the corresponding judicial relief,we should promote thorough revocation of verdict,straighten out the coverage of general payment decision,expand the applicable scope of the judgment for administrative omission and introduce the resident litigation system.

关 键 词：公物利用 侵权形态 主观公权利 司法救济 

分 类 号：DF3[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]