检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江省立同德医院急诊科,310012 [2]浙江省立同德医院护理部,310012
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2015年第18期2188-2190,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基 金:国家医学教育发展中心课题项目(2013-30-04-021)
摘 要:目的:观察急诊快捷护理流程应用于急性脑卒中患者中临床效果。方法采用前后对照的回顾性分析法将2014年3—7月38例急性脑卒中患者作为观察组,2013年12月—2014年2月38例患者作为对照组。对照组采用常规护理流程,观察组采用急诊快捷护理流程。比较两组患者从接诊到确诊的时间、确诊到专科的治疗时间、残疾率及死亡率。结果观察组从接诊到确诊时间为(15.78±3.64)min、确诊到专科治疗时间为(26.01±4.12)min,明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t 值分别为3.154,8.172;P <0.05);观察组残疾率(5.26%)和死亡率(2.63%)明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ2值分别为12.71,9.27;P <0.05)。结论临床应用急诊快捷护理流程可缩短患者就诊时间,从而降低脑卒中患者残疾率和死亡率。Objective To explore the clinical effects of quick emergency process on the treatment of patients with acute cerebral apoplexy. Methods A total of 38 patients with acute cerebral apoplexy used quick emergency process chosen as observation group from March to July 2014 while 38 patients with acute cerebral apoplexy underwent routine nursing selected as control group(routine nursing process)from December 2013 to February 2014. We compared the time from admission to diagnosis,from diagnosis to special treatment,rate of disability and mortality. Results The time from admission to diagnosis was(15. 78 ± 3. 64)min,time from diagnosis to special treatment was(26. 01 ± 4. 12)min,which was shorter than these of the control group(t =3. 154,8. 172;P 〈0. 05);the rate of disability was 5. 26% while the mortality rate was 2. 63% ,which was lower than these of the control group(χ2 = 12. 71,9. 27;P 〈0. 05). Conclusions The clinical application of quick emergency process can shorten the hospitalization time and reduce the disability and mortality rate of patients with cerebral apoplexy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222