检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁艳[1]
出 处:《法学论坛》2015年第4期28-35,共8页Legal Forum
基 金:国家社科基金项目<现代权利理论研究:以"意志理论"与"利益理论"评析为起点>(11BFX006)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:期货市场有价证券充抵保证金实务的核心问题是以何种法律路径作为基础构建具体制度规则。域外实践提供了三种法律路径:信托、让与担保和权利质权,这些法律路径虽各有优势,但在我国现行法律框架下也都面临种种障碍。比较而言,权利质权路径更能平衡当事人的利益,与我国现行法律衔接更为顺畅,保持了法律的稳定性和系统性。采用权利质权路径,需要扩大适用转质押的证券范围,并在质押登记方面进行制度创新,提供更详细的规则来高效的实现担保权。The legal approach to construct the margin securities system is of great importance issue to the futures market. There are three legal approaches from foreign laws : trust, chattel mortgage and pledge, each of these routes have obvious advantages and there also exist some obstacles under current legal regime. Based upon the comparative analysis, it seems that the pledge is the most fair and efficient one. The pledge approach can keep the right balance between the customer and broker, solve the problem of legal cohesive requirements, and maintain the stability and legitimacy of law. Under the pledge approach we should expand the scope of repledge to cover more types of securities, improve the systems of securities pledge registration and provide more detailed rules on enforcement of security interests.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.94.189