检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《当代护士(下旬刊)》2015年第8期4-5,共2页Modern Nurse
基 金:江门市科技计划项目(编号:2014020)
摘 要:目的探讨临床护理路径应用于颅内动脉支架成形术患者的实际效果。方法将2013年1月至2014年8月在中山大学附属江门医院治疗的50例患者随机分成两组——观察组和对照组,各25例。全部患者都采取整体护理,对照组利用沿用的健康教育方式,观察组使用CNP方式。后对比两组的平均住院时间(d)和他们对健康教育知识的理解和接受情况以及对护理效果的满意程度。结果观察组平均住院天数10.5 d明显少于对照组13.5 d;观察组内的患者对上述知识的掌握和满意程度均明显好于对比组(P<0.05)。结论临床护理路径可以为患者提供高品质、高效率、低成本的诊疗护理新模式。由于它具备的上述特点,势必对护理工作带来深刻的影响。Objective To analyze the actual effect of the application of clinical nursing pathway (CNP) in intracranial angloplasty and stent- ing.Methods We divided 50 patients randomly into two groups, observational group and control group, 25 patients respectively from Jan 2013 to August 2014. All patients were treated with holistic nursing, while observational group adopted CNP and control group followed the health educational mode, and then we compared two groups ' average hospital stays, the extent of their understanding and acceptance of health education knowledge and their satisfaction degree to the nursing efficacy. Results The average hospital stays in observational group were 10.5 days which we're apparently less than 13.5 days of control group. The patients from observational group also had better an understanding and acceptance of knowledge mentioned above and a better satisfaction degree than those from control group ( P〈0. 5 ). Conclusion CNP pro- vides patients with a new nursing model which has higher quality, higher efficiency but lower diagnosis and treatment cost, which certainly brings a profound etfeet to the nursing system due to its characteristics above.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3