检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]同济大学环境科学与工程学院,上海200092 [2]国家住宅与居住环境工程技术研究中心,北京100044
出 处:《中国给水排水》2015年第15期143-146,共4页China Water & Wastewater
基 金:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2014ZX07406002)
摘 要:在34层高度的试验塔上,采用瞬间流发生器排水,考察不同排水流量在各特殊单立管排水系统中所产生的压力,探究压力与流量之间的关系,得出在瞬间流排水时系统相应的排水能力,并进行多角度分析比较。结果表明:苏维托系统排水能力明显优于DN110内螺旋+加强型旋流器系统、DN110内螺旋+普通型旋流器系统,且整个管道系统内的压力波动也明显小于另外两套系统;DN110内螺旋+普通型以及DN110内螺旋+加强型系统的排水能力明显小于我国《建筑给水排水设计规范》(GB 50015—2009)中相应最大设计排水能力值。The instantaneous flow generator was used to drain away water from a 34-floor tower. The different drainage pressure in each special single stack drainage system was investigated. The relationship between the pressure and flow rate was explored, and the corresponding drainage capacity of the system using instantaneous flow was confirmed, with multi-angle analysis and comparison performed. The results showed that the drainage capacity of Suwito system was better than that of DN110 interior spiral + strengthened cyclone system or DN110 interior spiral + ordinary cyclone system, and the pressure fluctuation of the pipeline system was significantly less than that of the other two systems. The drainage capacities of both DN110 interior spiral + strengthened cyclone system and DN110 interior spiral + ordinary cyclone system were significantly smaller than the maximum design drainage capacity of the Code for Design of Building Water Supply and Drainage (GB 50015 -2009).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.172.197