检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]暨南大学医学院附属广州市红十字会医院护理部,510000
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2015年第19期2240-2242,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
摘 要:目的:通过对造口治疗师工作模式指标体系量表信度和效度的检验分析,验证该量表的合理性。方法将150份基本样本和20份重测样本进行统计,对其结果的信度、重测信度、内容效度及结构效度进行检验。结果本量表信度为Cronbach′s α系数为0.77,重测信度(用斯皮尔曼相关系数即Spearman等级相关系数表示)为0.82;内容效度(用量表全部指标的内容效度指数和量表总的内容效度指数表示)及结构效度(常用因子分析法评价)均良好。结论该量表具有较高的信度和效度,可以作为造口治疗师岗位能力考评的参考依据。Objective To confirmed the rationality of“Enterostomal therapist working mode index” by analyzing its reliability and validity. Methods A total of 150 basic samples and 20 resurvey samples were used to test the reliability ( Cronbach′s α coefficient ) , retest reliability, content validity and structure validity. Results The reliability (Cronbach′sαcoefficient) of“enterostomal therapist working mode index” was 0. 77, while the retest reliability ( the Spearman correlation coefficient) was 0. 82, and the general content validity index of this system and the structure validity ( factor analysis method was used to analyze ) was ideal. Conclusions “Enterostomal therapist working mode index” was reliable and valuable to be used to review the job ability of enterostomal therapist.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145