检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭小龙[1] 杨雅琦[1] 刘静[1] 冯四平[1]
出 处:《医学与社会》2015年第B06期71-72,共2页Medicine and Society
摘 要:目的:评价围术期预防应用抗菌药物的药学干预。方法:选取2012年2月-2014年10月我院收治的170例外科手术患者随机分为对照组(n=85,给予传统用药干预)和试验组(n=85,给予围术期药学干预),比较2组患者用药合理性、感染发生率以及住院时间、住院费用等指标。结果:试验组患者用药合理性84.7%明显高于对照纽49.4%,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05);试验组住院时间、住院费用以及感染发生率等指标均显著优于对照纽,纽间差异存在统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论:囿术期预防应用抗菌药物的药学干预可显著降低感染率,缩短住院时间,减少住院费用,促进患者早日恢复健康,具有积极的临床应用和推广价值。Objective: To evaluate the perioperative prophylactic use of antibiotics pharmaceutical intervention. Methods : February 2012 - 170 eases of Surgical Operations in October 2014 in our hospital were randomly divided into control group (n = 85, giving traditional medicine intervention) and the experimental group ( n = 85, giving perioperative pharmaceutical intervention ), two groups were compared in patients with medication rationality, infection rates and length of hospital stay, hospital costs and other indicators. Results : Patients with drug treatment group was significantly higher rationality 84. 7% 49.4%, the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0. 05 ) ; test group hospital stay, hospital costs and the incidence of infection and other indicators are significantly better than the control group, the group There were significant differences between (P 〈0. 05). Conclusion: The periop- erative prophylactic use of antibiotics pharmaceutical interventions can significantly reduce the rate of infection, shorter hospital stays and reduce hospital costs and promote early recovery of patients with positive clinical application and popularization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15