检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈晨[1]
机构地区:[1]中央财经大学,北京100081
出 处:《山西警官高等专科学校学报》2015年第3期10-14,共5页Journal of Shanxi Pollce Academy
摘 要:收容教育制度设立初期,对于根除旧社会遗留下来的卖淫嫖娼丑恶现象起到了一定的作用。但近年来,随着法治精神的深入人心和《立法法》的实施,收容教育制度由于长时间限制人身自由、不合法律程序、严重违反法治精神在法律界受到较大诟病。学界对此大体存在"行政强制说"、"行政处罚说"、"保安处分措施说"以及"违法惯常行为矫治措施说"四种,四种学说各有利弊。Detaining education system has played certain role in eliminating prostitution and whoring left by old society in its early establishment. However in recent years,because of the popularity of legal spirit in the hearts of people and the implementation of"Legislative Law",detaining education system violates the legal spirit and is scolded by the legal field due to long time restriction of personal freedom and illegal procedure. The academic circle has 4 theories about it,"administrative compulsory measure","administrative penalty","security measure"and "illegal behavior and correcting measure"and they are advantageous or disadvantageous.
关 键 词:收容教育 行政强制措施 行政处罚 保安处分 违法行为矫治措施
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.208.57