应用生物阻抗频谱法对循经体液分布的初步观察  

Preliminary Observation on the Body Fluid Distribution along Meridian Using Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Method

作　　者：云洁[1,2] 王燕平[1] 张维波[2] 李刚[3] 刘近贞[3] 王广军[2] 田宇瑛[2] 贾术永[2] 李宏彦[1,2] 王泽[2] 

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学针灸推拿学院,北京100029 [2]中国中医科学院针灸研究所,北京100700 [3]天津大学精密仪器与光电子工程学院,天津300072

出　　处：《中国中医基础医学杂志》2015年第7期853-856,共4页JOURNAL OF BASIC CHINESE MEDICINE

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(30840101)-基于组织液通道的小型猪经脉不通病理模型研究;中国中医科学院自主课题(ZZKF06010)-基于组织液通道的电阻抗成像法经络三维定位

摘　　要：目的:比较胃经大腿段与非经体液分布的差异。方法:10例健康受试者平卧30 min后,使用四电极生物阻抗频谱测量大腿段胃经与旁开非经部位,通过MATLAB软件处理后得到细胞内外液阻抗,结合大腿周长计算经上与经外细胞内外液电阻率。结果:经上细胞外液电阻率比经外小,差异百分比为15.84%,差异有统计学意义;经上与经外细胞内液电阻率比较差异无统计学意义。结论:大腿段胃经经脉线上细胞外液含量多于旁开非经部位,细胞内液含量基本相同。Objective： To compare the difference of interstitial fluid volume on the Stomach Meridian（ ST） and nonmeridian（ NM） on the anterior thigh. Methods： 10 healthy subjects were asked to lie spine for 30 min and then we used four electrodes bioimpedance spectroscopy system to test the amplitude and phase angle on ST and NM. By using software MATLAB R2011 a, cole-cole curve fitting and the circumference of the thigh we figured out the resistivity of the extracellular fluid（ ECF） and intracellular fluid（ ICF） on ST and NM relatively. Results： The resistivity of ECF on the ST is lower than that of the NM with a difference percent of 15. 84%,which had a very significant difference. While the resistivity of the ICF on the ST and NM had no significant difference. Conclusion： There were more extracellular fluid on the Stomach Meridian than the nonmeridian while the volume of the intracellular fluid were almost the same on the Stomach Meridian and the nonmeridian.

关 键 词：经络 生物阻抗频谱法 组织液 细胞外液 细胞内液 四电极法 

分 类 号：R245.9[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]