检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张兵[1]
机构地区:[1]南开大学经济学院
出 处:《南开经济研究》2015年第3期3-18,共16页Nankai Economic Studies
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(项目批准号:13YJAGJW009)的阶段性成果
摘 要:中国经济"新常态"以及美国经济的发展走势是当前整个世界关注的焦点。本文通过建立中美两国经济周期波动的马尔科夫区制转移模型进行估计,结果表明中美两国经济周期的波动存在具有明显协动性的区制,且两国经济周期的波动区制都具有较强的"自维持"特征。但当前中美两国经济周期的波动区制也表现出了明显不同的特点:中国经济周期正处于受美国经济"冲击波动"的区制,经济增长的"自律性"有所减弱;而美国经济周期则正处于"自律波动"区制。这意味着当前美国经济的复苏向好有助于拉动中国经济增长,而中国经济增速放缓的"新常态"对美国经济的负面影响并不明显。At present, the economic "New Normal " of China and the economic devel- opment situation of the USA are the focus of the world. In this paper we establish Markov regime-switching models to estimate the business cycles fluctuation of China and the USA. The results show that there is obvious co-movement in the business cycles fluctuation of China and the USA and the business cycle regimes of the two countries have stronger self- persistence characteristics. However, the current business cycle fluctuation regimes of China and the USA also have obviously different characteristics: The business cycle of China is in the shock-fluctuation regime and the self-discipline of economic growth is weak to some extent, while the business cycle of the USA is in the self-discipline-fluctuation regime. This implies that the current economic recovery of the USA helps fuel China's eco- nomic growth, and the "New Normal " of Chinese slower economic growth has little negative effect on the USA.
关 键 词:经济周期协动性 马尔科夫区制转移模型 “自律波动”区制 “冲击波动”区制
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.86.123