检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩启金[1] 马灵玲[2] 刘李[1] 张学文[1] 傅俏燕[1] 潘志强[1] 王爱春[1]
机构地区:[1]中国资源卫星应用中心,北京100094 [2]中国科学院光电研究院,北京100190
出 处:《光学学报》2015年第7期364-371,共8页Acta Optica Sinica
基 金:国家863计划课题(2012AA12A302);国家自然科学基金(41401424)
摘 要:为检测高分二号(GF-2)卫星发射前后辐射性能变化,获取可靠的GF-2卫星遥感器在轨定标系数,提出了基于宽动态地面目标的场地定标方法。以敦煌戈壁场为基础,重新选建涵盖高、中、低多级反射特性的定标场,并借助反射率基法和地面观测试验,实现了GF-2卫星首次在轨辐射定标。以发射前实验室定标结果为参考,讨论GF-2卫星定标系数变化及影响因素。结果表明:1)GF-2卫星发射前后系统自身偏移量均接近于零,且相对稳定;而辐射响应特性发生了一定变化;2)采用多场地定标获取的在轨定标系数能更好表征GF-2卫星在轨辐射特性,该定标系数可作为后续定量产品反演和系统性能评估的基础。To validate the radiometric performance changing of GF-2 satellite, and obtain reliable on-orbit calibration coefficients of GF-2 sensors, an in-situ calibration methodology based on wide dynamic ground target is presented. Based on Dunhuang Gobi site, a test site including high, middle, and low reflective characteristics is re-selected and established. After that, the first on-orbit calibration for GF-2 is performed using the reflectance-based method and field measurement campaign. At last, the calibration coefficients changes and influence by comparing with prelaunch laboratory calibration results is discussed. The results indicate that: 1) the system offset of GF-2 itself is close to zero and relatively stable, while the radiometric responsivity has changed; 2) the calibration coefficients by using multi-site calibration method can better characterize on-orbit performance of GF-2 compared to the prelaunch lab calibration; the new calibration coefficients can be used for quantitative products retrieval and systems performance evaluation.
分 类 号:TP722.4[自动化与计算机技术—检测技术与自动化装置] TP721.1[自动化与计算机技术—控制科学与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.121.29