一般人格权理论分析及我国的立法选择  

The Theoretical Analysis of General Personality Right and our Legislative Choice

作　　者：方金华[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400044

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2015年第4期34-42,共9页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：福建省法学会2014年度法学研究一般课题FLS(2014)B07"一般人格权理论问题研究"

摘　　要：法律的制定应该简明、正确,不能使法律专业人士困惑、迷茫,更应该让普通百姓易知易懂,这是法典制定应该遵循的规律和发展方向。一般人格权是德国在特殊法哲学和立法背景下之特殊产物,本质并不是"权利",其立法技术形式饱受质疑,引入一般人格权不仅损害法律的安定性,也与我国《侵权责任法》在内容与形式上产生冲突。对于我国,没有引入一般人格权之必要,其功能可由其他制度替代,人格权立法保护模式采列举各种具体人格权结合一般人格保护条款为应然选择。Laws should be concise and correct, don＇t make people confused, and should let ordinary people easy to understand. This is the rule and development direction. General personality fight is the special product of philosophy of law and legislative background in Germany, its nature is not the ＂fight＂ , many jurists question the form of legislation technology. Introducing the general personality fight will not only damage the stability of law, but also lead to conflict in the content and form with Tort law in our country. We don＇t have the necessity of introduction of general personality fight, its function can be replaced by other system. It is ought to choose that protected mode in Personality fight legislation take listing concrete personality fights in combination with general personality protection clause.

关 键 词：人格权 一般人格权 人格利益 立法模式 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]