科学争论的语境论解释  

The Contextualist Interpretation of Scientific Controversy

作　　者：郭贵春[1] 张旭[1] 

机构地区：[1]山西大学科学技术哲学研究中心,太原030006

出　　处：《科学技术哲学研究》2015年第4期1-10,共10页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology

基　　金：教育部人文社科重点基地重大项目"语境论科学哲学研究纲领"(13JJD720013)

摘　　要：不断进步的科学和逐渐完善的相关社会建制,以及渐趋成熟的新修辞学理论,都为科学争论研究带来了转变,然而,对于在争论中如何正确理解科学的社会性等问题,科学哲学尚没有形成一种普遍公认的有效进路。将语境论思想与科学修辞学结合,在语境交流平台中重新整合科学争论的具体案例研究,从而形成统一的科学认识,是解决科学争论问题的可行性研究思路。With the progress of science,the gradual improvement of social institutions and the growth of rhetoric of science,new changes have taken place in the study of scientific controversy. However,as for how to understand correctly the question of the sociability of science,the philosophy of science has not produced a universally accepted theory. It is feasible for solving problems in the study of scientific controversy to introduce contextualism into rhetoric of science,integrate case studies of scientific controversy in the interactive platform of contextualism,and thus to develop a universal understanding on science.

关 键 词：科学争论 语境论 科学修辞学 

分 类 号：N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]