检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2015年第19期230-231,共2页China Health Standard Management
摘 要:目的分析探讨临床护理路径在股骨干骨折护理中的应用价值。方法选取我院于2013年4月~2014年6月收治的股骨干骨折患者80例作为临床研究对象,以护理方式作为分组标准将患者分为观察组和对照组,每组各40例。观察组患者采用临床护理路径法进行护理,对照组患者给予常规护理。比较两组患者的焦虑抑郁评分、护理满意度、平均住院时间、平均住院费用的情况。结果经过不同方式的护理之后,观察组患者的护理满意度高于对照组,焦虑抑郁评分、平均住院时间和平均住院费用均低于对照组,组间比较结果具有差异(P〈0.05)。结论临床护理路径对股骨干骨折护理工作具有积极的影响。Objective To analyze the clinical nursing pathway in the treatment of femoral shaft fracture and its application value.Methods Selected in our hospital from April 2013 to June 2014 of femoral shaft fractures 80 cases, as a clinical study and they were divided into observation group and control group, each with 40 cases. The observation group were treated with clinical nursing path methods, the control group received routine nursing care. The anxiety and depression score, nursing satisfaction, average hospitalization time and average hospitalization expenses of the two groups were compared.Results After different ways of nursing ,nursing satisfaction of patients was significantly higher than that of the control group, anxiety depression scores, average hospitalization time and the average cost of hospitalization were significantly lower than control group(P〈 0.05).Conclusion The clinical nursing pathway has positive effect on the nursing of femoral shaft fracture.
分 类 号:R248.1[医药卫生—中医临床基础]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.227