检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐松鹤[1] 韩传峰[1] 孟令鹏[2] 吴启迪[2]
机构地区:[1]同济大学经济与管理学院,上海200092 [2]同济大学电子与信息工程学院,上海200092
出 处:《中国软科学》2015年第7期20-28,共9页China Soft Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金重大研究计划重点支持项目(91024023;91224003)
摘 要:中国应急管理体系存在着应急主体单一、权责匹配失当、法律位阶过低等问题,原因在于体系的动力结构失衡。厘清"一案三制"的内涵、功能及相互作用关系,分析美国和中国应急管理体系的动力结构特征:美国属法制驱动模式,社会广泛参与,体系较完备,操作性强,调整及时但易过度,动力传导效率较低;中国属体制驱动模式,政府高度集权,动力传导效率高,但体系不完备,操作性较差,调整滞后。结合中国应急管理所面临的理论预设更新、执政方式转变、社会结构变革、社会风险加剧等新态势,秉承多元治理理念,以制度创新为核心,从主体关系、制度规范、协同机制、文化培育等方面,提出中国应急管理体系的模式重构策略。There are several problems including government's sole discretion and matching misconduct of rights and responsibilities and a low level of legal hierarchy in Chinag emergency management system as a result of unbalance of the dynamical structure. This paper analyzes connotation, function and action mechanism of one-plan-three-system first. Then features of the emergency management system of United States and China were discussed respectively. The former in terms of legal driving has wider social participation, a more sophisticated system, better operability and higher level of agility, but inefficiency in power transmission. However, the latter in terms of institutional driving stands on the opposite position. Considering the changes of theoretical precondition, ruling mode, social structure and social risks faced by emergency managers in China, emergency management system can be reconstruction from the aspects of organization relationship, system specification, synergy mechanism and cultural cultivation adhering to the concept multi-governance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166