检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张伟华[1] 李卫侠[1] 吴梦雄[1] 常蕊[1] 董海鹏[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院放射科,上海200025
出 处:《诊断学理论与实践》2015年第3期244-247,共4页Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice
摘 要:目的 :探讨基于原始数据的迭代重建(sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction,SAFIRE)技术在头颈部动脉CT血管造影(CT angiography,CTA)中的应用。方法:将90例患者随机分为全剂量组(130 k V/140 m As;CTDIvol=15.39 m Gy组,46例)和半剂量组(110 k V/104 m As;CTDIvol=7.7 m Gy组,44例),进行头颈部动脉CTA检查。对全剂量组数据采用滤波反投影(filtered back projection,FBP)重建,对半剂量组数据分别采用FBP及SAFIRE重建,并分别计算2组数据的主动脉弓根部、颈总动脉分叉处、基底动脉起始处、大脑中动脉的CT值、噪声、信噪比(signal to noise ratio,SNR)、对比噪声比(contrast to noise ratio,CNR)。结果 :在半剂量组中,主动脉弓根部、颈总动脉分叉处、基底动脉起始处及大脑中动脉的SAFIRE 1~3级重建与FBP重建方法相比,SAFIRE 3级的图像噪声最低,SNR和CNR显著提高,组间数据差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。半剂量组SAFIRE 3级重建与全剂量组FBP重建相比,半剂量组SAFIRE 3级重建的图像噪声显著降低,SNR和CNR显著提高,2组数据间差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论 :与FBP相比,SAFIRE在辐射剂量较低的条件下仍能获得高质量的图像。Objective To study the performance of sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction(SAFIRE) in head and neck CT angiograph(CTA). Methods: Ninety subjects undergone CT angiography scan of head and neck were prospective-ly randomly divided into two groups: 46 subjects for full-dose group(FD, 130 k V/140 m As; CTDIvol=15.39 m Gy) and 44 subjects for half-dose group(HD, 110 k V/104 m As; CTDIvol=7.7 m Gy). The data of FD group were reconstructed by filtered back projection(FBP), and the data of HD group were reconstructed both by FBP and SAFIRE with strength one to three(SAFIRE 1-3). The CT value, noise, signal to noise ratios(SNR) and contrast to noise ratio(CNR) of aortic arch,carotid artery bifurcation, basilar artery and middle cerebral artery were measured for both groups. Results: For HD group,SAFIRE 3 significantly decreased image noise and increased SNR and CNR when compared with FBP( P〈0.05). Compared with FBP and SAFIRE 1-2, SAFIRE 3 had the lowest image noise in HD group. SAFIRE 3 significantly decreased image noise and increased SNR and CNR in HD group when compared with FBP in FD group(P〈0.05). Conclusions: Compared with FBP, SAFIRE with low dose could significantly improve image quality for head and neck CTA.
分 类 号:R445.4[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222