两种洗胃法在小儿口服中毒中的应用效果  

Application effect of two kinds of gastric lavage in children with oral poisoning

作　　者：黄桂贤[1] 李雪坚 

机构地区：[1]中山大学附属第一医院

出　　处：《全科护理》2015年第20期1975-1977,共3页Chinese General Practice Nursing

摘　　要：[目的]观察经鼻腔插入胃管接灌肠袋法洗胃与催吐洗胃在小儿口服中毒中的应用效果。[方法]将45例误服中毒的患儿分为对照组和观察组,对照组采用催吐洗胃,观察组采用经鼻腔插入胃管接灌肠袋洗胃法,比较两组的洗胃效果。[结果]两组洗胃时间、每次洗胃液的入量、出量、残余量及患儿配合程度、并发症、洗胃成功率方面比较,观察组明显优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。[结论]经鼻腔插入胃管法洗胃在小儿口服中毒中明显优于催吐洗胃。Objective：To observe the application effect of inserting the tube through the nose connecting enema bag for lavage and vomiting gastric lavage in children with oral toxicity.Methods：A total of 45 children with coverage poisoning were divided into control group and observation group.The patients in control group received the vomiting for gastric lavage,the patients in observation group received the tube inserted through the nose connecting enema bag for lavage,then to compare the effect of gastric lavage.Results：There was statistically significant difference in gastric lavage time,each intake,the amount and remaining amount of gastric washing,children＇s cooperation degree,complications and gastric lavage success rate（P〈0.01）.Conclusion：The inserting the tube through the nose for lavage is superior to vomiting gastric lavage in Insert the tube through the nose nasal gastric tube insertion in children with oral poisoning.

关 键 词：口服中毒 经鼻腔插胃管洗胃 催吐洗胃 小儿 

分 类 号：R725.9[医药卫生—儿科]