检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柳素欣
机构地区:[1]胶州市人民医院,266300
出 处:《国际医药卫生导报》2015年第15期2254-2256,共3页International Medicine and Health Guidance News
摘 要:目的探讨手外伤带蒂岛状皮瓣术后护理中疼痛护理干预的实施效果。方法从本院2013年2月至2014年2月收治的手外伤患者中随机选择69例进行研究,随机分为对照组(33例)和观察组(36例),均实施带蒂岛状皮瓣移植,并分别给予常规护理和常规护理联合疼痛护理。观察两组患者的治疗效果和皮瓣成活率以及疼痛评分变化情况,并进行比较。结果观察组的治疗总优良率和皮片成活率分别为91.7%和(92.31±5.62)%,均显著高于对照组的63.6%和(83.21±4.98)%,P〈0.05。治疗后观察组的疼痛评分显著低于对照组,P〈0.05。结论对接受手外伤带蒂岛状皮瓣移植的患者实施术后常规护理联合疼痛护理干预可以获得良好的实施效果。Objective To explore the effect of pain nursing intervention in nursing care after pedicled island flap transplantation for hand injury. Methods 69 patients with hand injury admitted into our hospital from February, 2013 to February, 2014 were selected and were divided into a control group (33 cases) and an observation group (36 cases). All the patients were given pedicled island flap transplantation. The control group were given routine nursing care; in addition, the observation group were intervened with pain nursing. The efficacy, skin flap survival rate, and pain score were observed and compared between these two groups. Results The the rate of excellentness and goodness and skin flap survival rate were 91.7% and (92.31±5.62)% in the observation group and 63.6% and (83.21±4.98)% in the observation group (P〈0.05). After the treatment, the pain scores were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion Pain nursing intervention in combination with routine nursing care after pedicled island flap transplantation for hand injury is effective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200