胰岛素不同注射方式对血糖控制的效果及护理风险观察  

GLYCEMIC CONTROL AND NURSING RISK IN DIFFERENT INJECTION TECHNIQUE OF INSULIN

作　　者：张玉[1] 廖露[1] 闵芊瑜 杨文彬[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省第二人民医院,广东广州510317

出　　处：《现代医院》2015年第8期94-95,共2页Modern Hospitals

摘　　要：目的：研究胰岛素不同注射方式对糖尿病患者的临床疗效与护理风险。方法将2013年2月∽2014年7月收治的120例糖尿病患者按随机数字法将其分为对照组和观察组，每组60例。对照组患者按照标准程序进行胰岛素注射，观察组患者则使用改进后的方式进行胰岛素注射。对比两组患者治疗前后血糖浓度、血糖达标所需时间和两组护理风险。结果观察组治疗后空腹血糖浓度为（5．56±0．43） mmol／L，餐后血糖浓度为（7．89±1．33） mmol／L，均明显低于对照组患者的血糖浓度（6．78±0．65）mmol／L，（9．36±2．37） mmol／L；血糖达标所需时间也较对照组短；且观察组出现护理风险的比率明显低于对照组，差异均具有统计学意义（均p＜0．05）。结论采用改良后的胰岛素注射方式治疗糖尿病更有效，其出现滴液、渗液等护理风险也较低，安全性好，值得临床推荐。Objective To investigate the effects of different insulin injection methods on clinical efficacy and nursing risk in diabetic patients.Methods 120 diabetic patients were enrolled in this study between Feb.2013 and Jul.2014, who were then ran-domly divided into two groups：control group （n=60） and observed group （n=60）.In control group, insulin was injected by stand-ard method, while improved method of insulin injection was used in observed group.Blood glucose, treatment period and nursing risk were compared in these two groups.Results Patients in observed group achieved better glucose control in less time than those in con-trol group.After therapy, fasting blood glucose in observed group was （5.56 ±0.43） mmol/L vs （6.78 ±0.65） mmol/L in control group, while postprandial blood glucose was （7.89 ±1.33） mmol/L vs （9.36 ±2.37） mmol/L.In addition, nursing risk in ob-served group was significantly lower than that in control group.Conclusion Taken together, due to better clinical efficacy and less nursing risk, improved method of insulin injection is worth to be recommended in clinic.

关 键 词：胰岛素注射方式 糖尿病 临床疗效 护理风险 

分 类 号：R587.1[医药卫生—内分泌]